Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Educational Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cuban, L.
Right arrow Articles by Peck, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

High Access and Low Use of Technologies in High School Classrooms: Explaining an Apparent Paradox

Larry Cuban

Stanford University

Heather Kirkpatrick

Aspire Public Schools

Craig Peck

Stanford University

Most policy makers, corporate executives, practitioners, and parents assume that wiring schools, buying hardware and software, and distributing the equipment throughout will lead to abundant classroom use by teachers and students and improved teaching and learning. This article examines these assumptions in two high schools located in the heart of technological progress, Northern California’s Silicon Valley. Our qualitative methodology included interviews with teachers, students, and administrators, classroom observations, review of school documents, and surveys of both teachers and students in the two high schools. We found that access to equipment and software seldom led to widespread teacher and student use. Most teachers were occasional users or nonusers. When they used computers for classroom work, more often than not their use sustained rather than altered existing patterns of teaching practice. We offer two interrelated explanations for these challenges to the dominant assumptions that guide present technological policy making.

American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 38, No. 4, 813-834 (2001)
DOI: 10.3102/00028312038004813


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
S. Cilesiz
Educational Computer Use in Leisure Contexts: A Phenomenological Study of Adolescents' Experiences at Internet Cafes
American Educational Research Journal, March 1, 2009; 46(1): 232 - 274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
A. A. Zucker and D. Light
Laptop Programs for Students
Science, January 2, 2009; 323(5910): 82 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Urban EducationHome page
M. G. Gibbs, A. J. Dosen, and R. B. Guerrero
Bridging the Digital Divide: Changing the Technological Landscape of Inner-City Catholic Schools
Urban Education, January 1, 2009; 44(1): 11 - 29.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
W. R. Penuel, B. J. Fishman, R. Yamaguchi, and L. P. Gallagher
What Makes Professional Development Effective? Strategies That Foster Curriculum Implementation
American Educational Research Journal, December 1, 2007; 44(4): 921 - 958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



AER home page RER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page